Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
#355 closed Bug (fixed)
jet mass for the option 7
Reported by: | Sergei Chekanov | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | |
Component: | Delphes code | Version: | Delphes 3 |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
Hi,
I'm trying to reconstruct the jet subjetiness using the option 7. I guess, this is the KT jet algorithm (not antiKT?). The problem I see is the when I retrieve jet momentum and look at the jet mass, I have very small values, close to 0. When I use the standard jets (the option 5, antiKT), the jet mass is correct. Is this a feature or a bug? I use Delphes 3.12
Change History (4)
comment:1 by , 10 years ago
comment:2 by , 10 years ago
Dear Sergei,
concerning vanishing masses with winner-take)-all it was indeed an issue with fastjet
non properly calculating the jet four vector direction when other than E-scheme is being used.
For now, you can take "FastJetFinder.cc" from here (and recompile):
https://github.com/delphes/delphes/blob/TestFastJet310b1/modules/FastJetFinder.cc
or wait for new release (that should come in days …).
Anyway, thank you for finding the bug.
Cheers,
Michele
comment:3 by , 10 years ago
This problem is fixed in d244bc9e8401e7ddf998acf45b845c99dfc0333c/git.
Closing this ticket.
comment:4 by , 10 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Hi,
option 7 corresponds to anti-kT with the so called "winner-take-all" procedure.
You can read more about it in here:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1401.2158v1.pdf
I am not sure whether what you observe is a feature. In principle the jet masses should be comparable.
I will run some tests tomorrow and let you know.
Michele