Changes between Version 12 and Version 13 of Private/RefereeComments/Section_2

Timestamp:

Oct 3, 2013, 10:22:46 AM (11 years ago)

Author:

Michele Selvaggi

Comment:

--

Private/RefereeComments/Section_2

@@ -170 +170 @@
 sentence of PAGE 4 and the first sentence of PAGE 5.
 
->>> 
-
+>>> Figure 5 has been updated, and the discrepancy at high energy is not present anymore. 
+>>> It is already mentionned that this assumption is true in reality only up to some energy threshold,
+>>> but we adopt it however for any energy. After the new energy-flow implementation, we have noticed
+>>> that the agreement is now good at high energy (Fig. 5).
 
 Par 3.
@@ -186 +188 @@
 >> See previous answer about our decision to talk about "PF-like emulation".
 >> We don't want to perform a real reconstruction, and therefore a real particle-id algorithm, but to emulate its effects. The gains from PF are larger on jets and MET than on other high-level objects, and therefore the need for an emulation of PF effects is stronger for jets and MET.
+>>> (michele: agree with this!)
+
 
 First bullet: ”Hits” are not defined, and it is difficult to understand the