Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of Private/RefereeComments/Introduction

Timestamp:

Aug 27, 2013, 11:45:09 AM (11 years ago)

Author:

Andrea Giammanco

Comment:

--

Private/RefereeComments/Introduction

@@ -9 +9 @@
 
 >> (Andrea's temporary comment) I don't think it's very relevant, but just for the sake of compromise, we can do.
-For ATLAS, I know this reference: http://inspirehep.net/record/1196761
+>> For ATLAS, I know this reference: http://inspirehep.net/record/1196761
 but it is only for tracking; a more generic one, although it is just a conference proceeding, is http://inspirehep.net/record/1211010
-(I suggest to cite both, for completeness.)
-For CMS, the most recent and appropriate is: http://inspirehep.net/record/1214935
+>> (I suggest to cite both, for completeness.)
+>> For CMS, the most recent and appropriate is: http://inspirehep.net/record/1214935
 but there is the delicate point that there is not his name on it ;)
-So in addition one could also cite http://inspirehep.net/record/1117120 (but not this one alone, because some details are now obsolete, like the pileup treatment).
-Both are conference proceedings, but it is standard practice in CMS to cite them.
-And, still for CMS, one could argue that this one should be cited, because it contains comparison to data: http://inspirehep.net/record/1230052
+>> So in addition one could also cite http://inspirehep.net/record/1117120 (but not this one alone, because some details are now obsolete, like the pileup treatment).
+>> Both are conference proceedings, but it is standard practice in CMS to cite them.
+>> And, still for CMS, one could argue that also this one should be cited, because it contains comparison to data: http://inspirehep.net/record/1230052
+>> Please let me know if you think that these are too many citations.
 
 Third paragraph: