| 9 | |
| 10 | >> (Andrea's temporary comment) I don't think it's very relevant, but just for the sake of compromise, we can do. |
| 11 | For ATLAS, I know this reference: http://inspirehep.net/record/1196761 |
| 12 | but it is only for tracking; a more generic one, although it is just a conference proceeding, is http://inspirehep.net/record/1211010 |
| 13 | (I suggest to cite both, for completeness.) |
| 14 | For CMS, the most recent and appropriate is: http://inspirehep.net/record/1214935 |
| 15 | but there is the delicate point that there is not his name on it ;) |
| 16 | So in addition one could also cite http://inspirehep.net/record/1117120 (but not this one alone, because some details are now obsolete, like the pileup treatment). |
| 17 | Both are conference proceedings, but it is standard practice in CMS to cite them. |
| 18 | And, still for CMS, one could argue that this one should be cited, because it contains comparison to data: http://inspirehep.net/record/1230052 |
| 19 | |