Fork me on GitHub

Changes between Version 10 and Version 11 of Private/RefereeComments/Introduction


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Oct 9, 2013, 12:46:30 PM (11 years ago)
Author:
Michele Selvaggi
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Private/RefereeComments/Introduction

    v10 v11  
    7474as possible to the true (generated) list.” after ”sub-detectors”
    7575
    76 >>> see prior comment, not mentioning particle-flow at this stage, but just saying that we.
     76>>> not relevant anymore. We use energy-flow for jets and missing energy.
    7777
    7878L6: ”fully modular” would need some more explanation for the reader to
     
    102102>>>addressed:  "Charged particles have a user-defined probability to be seen as tracks"
    103103
    104 >>>(Michele suggested introduction)
    105 
    106 High energy particle collisions can produce a large variety of final states. Highly sophisticated detectors are designed in order to detect and precisely measure particles originating from such collisions. Experimental collaborations often rely on Monte-Carlo event generation for designing and optimizing specific analysis strategies. Whenever such studies require a high level of accuracy, the interactions of long-lived particles with the detector matter content are fully simulated with the \GEANT package~\cite{bib:geant4}, electronics response is emulated by dedicated routines, and final observables are reconstructed by means of complex algorithms. For preliminary studies, where such a high level of accuracy is not needed, LHC collaborations have developed their own fast-simulation techniques~\cite{bib:atlfast1,bib:atlfast2,bib:cmsfast1,bib:cmsfast2,bib:cmsfast3} which are 2 to 3 orders of magnitude faster than fully GEANT based simulation.
    107 
    108 This procedure requires expertise and the deployment of large scale computing resources that can be handled only by large collaborations.
    109 For most phenomenological studies, such a level of complexity is not needed and a simplified approach based on the parametrisation of the detector response is in general good enough. In 2009, the \DELPHES framework~\cite{bib:delphes} was designed to achieve such goal.
    110    
    111 \DELPHES takes as input the most common event generator output data-formats and performs a fast and realistic simulation of a general purpose collider detector.
    112 To do so, long-lived particles emerging from the hard scattering are propagated to the calorimeters within a uniform magnetic field along the beam direction. The particle energies are computed by smearing the initial long-lived visible particles momenta according to the resolution of the relevant sub-detectors. As a result, high-level physics objects such as jets, missing energy, isolated leptons and photons, and taus can be computed.
    113 
    114 With respect to its predecessor~\cite{bib:delphes}, the present \DELPHES version now includes a technique allowing to combine and optimally use the information of all the sub-detectors. This approach is particularly suitable to the treatment of pile-up, which has also been included in \DELPHES 3.0. Other features such as $b$ and $\tau$-tagging have been revisited, and it is now possible to apply an energy scale correction on jets. From a technical perspective, the code structure is now fully modular, providing a greater flexibility to the user.
    115 
    116 The modeling of the detector, as well as the reconstruction and validation of the physical observables will be described. A couple of illustrative use cases of Delphes in the context of LHC studies are presented.