Fork me on GitHub

Changes between Version 7 and Version 8 of Private/RefereeComments/Abstract


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Oct 15, 2013, 3:06:23 PM (11 years ago)
Author:
Christophe Delaere
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Private/RefereeComments/Abstract

    v7 v8  
    4848>>> (Christophe): I would add to the answer that: It is true, on the other hand, that some aspects of the default reconstruction sequence (e.g. focus on transverse quantities) are targeting hadron colliders. Because of the modular design, it is easy to adapt high-level routine to other needs. We now make that clear in a few places in the text.
    4949>>> I would also change the way we speak about the modular aspect. It is not because the code is modular than we can easily simulate the objects. The modular aspect makes it easy to adapt the sequence to particular needs. Therefore: "The version 3.0 of the \DELPHES fast-simulation is presented. Its goal is the simulation of a multipurpose detector that includes a track propagation system embedded in a magnetic field, electromagnetic and hadronic calorimeters, and a muon identification system. Physics objects that can be used for data analysis are then reconstructed from the simulated detector response. These include tracks and calorimeter deposits and high level objects such as isolated electrons, jets, taus, and missing energy. The new modular design makes it easy to adapt the sequence to particular needs. New features such as the energy-flow reconstruction approach, crucial in the first years of the LHC, and pile-up simulation and mitigation, which will be needed for the simulation of the LHC detectors in the near future, have also been implemented."
     50
     51>>> (Christophe) I don't like in the proposal the use of "energy-flow reconstruction". We have to be uniform with the rest of the paper but cannot yet rely on a reference to clarify our intent. Should we say "particle-flow-inspired reconstruction" ?