Working Group 3

Models available in different tools

x = available.

d = derived from more general model.

p = private implementation

c = contruction

w = wish

SM + extensions

SM = Standard Model

B-L = B-L symmetric Z' with heavy Majorana neutrinos

Zp = SM + Z'

2HDM14 = general 2 Higgs doublet model

Gen4 = 4th generation

ExF = Excited fermions

SUSY

cMSSM = constraint MSSM

MSSM124 = general MSSM, with 124 free parameters.

NMSSM = MSSM + 1 (super)singlet

RPVMSSM = MSSM + RPV terms in superpotential and LSoft

DGMSSM = Dirac gauginos (not clear which models aare implemented: pure Dirac, pseudo-Dirac,...)

LRMSSM = left-right symmetric MSSM

CPVMSSM = CP violating MSSM

LQMSSM = MSSM with leptoquarks

E6MSSM = E6 MSSM (overlap with LQMSSM -> S. King)

Extra dimensions

5DUED1 = 5D UED with 1KK layer

5DUED2 = 5D UED with 2KK layer

6DUEDx = 6D UED with xKK layers

ADD = ADD

RS = Randall Sundrum

Lepto quarks

LQC = Complete Lepto quarks

LQS = scalar lepto quarks

Technicolor & Higgsless

MWTC = Minimal walking technicolor

3SM = 3-site model

HLS = Hidden Local symmetry model

4SM = general 4-site model

4SMwDM = 4-site model constrained to have dark matter

Little Higgs

SILH = Strongly interacting little higgs

LHT = Littlest higss model with T-parity

LHTV = LHT + T-parity violation

Unparticles

UP = Unparticles

HV = Hidden Valley

	FR	LH	CHm	WO	SH	FA	MG	HW
SM	x	x	x	x	x	x	x	x
B-L	x	x
Zp			p
2HDM14	x		p				x
Gen4			p
ExF	c		p
cMSSM	xd	xd		xd	x	xd	x	x
MSSM124	x	x		x	x?	x
NMSSM	x	x		x				x
RPVMSSM	x	x						c
DGMSSM	x	x					p
LRMSSM	x	x
CPVMSSM	xd	x				xd
LQMSSM				x				c
E6MSSM		p
5DUED1	x		x
5DUED2			x
6DUED	c		x
ADD	x	50%
RS	90%
LQC		x	x
LQS		x	x
MWTC		p
3SM	x	x
4SM		30%
4SMwDM	40%
HLS	p	p
SILH	x
LHT		p					p
LHTV		p
UP
HV

Working Plan

We would like to perform a 4 star comparison between FR and LH for the following models:

• First thing is to get agreement between the LH SUSY implementation in CH and all the others as in the big FR paper.

• Randall Sundrum (started at the workshop) : FR and LH implementations will be validated in CalcHEP (3 star) : Priscila, Neil, Sasha. All model files available. Next step is comparison with MG-stock implementation of RS by Priscila and Qiang in v4. Finally, validation with FR+MG5 will be done so to get to 4 stars.