Changes between Version 22 and Version 23 of SMEFTatNLO
- Timestamp:
- Dec 16, 2020, 3:29:44 PM (4 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
SMEFTatNLO
v22 v23 3 3 ''Céline Degrande, Gauthier Durieux, Fabio Maltoni, Ken Mimasu, Eleni Vryonidou & Cen Zhang'', [https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.11743 arXiv:2008.11743] 4 4 5 The implementation is based on the Warsaw basis of dimension-six SMEFT operators, after canonical normali zation.5 The implementation is based on the Warsaw basis of dimension-six SMEFT operators, after canonical normalisation. 6 6 Electroweak input parameters are taken to be G,,F,,, M,,Z,,, M,,W,,. 7 The CKM matrix is approximated as a unit matrix, and a U(2),,q,, x U(2),,u,, x U(3),,d,, x (U(1),,l,, x U(1),,e,,)^3^ flavor symmetry is enforced.8 It forbids all fermion masses and Yukawa couplings except that only of the top quark.9 The model therefore implements the five-flavo r scheme for PDFs.10 11 12 A new coupling order , {{{NP=2}}},is assigned to SMEFT interactions.7 The CKM matrix is approximated as a unit matrix, and an exact U(2),,q,, x U(2),,u,, x U(3),,d,, x (U(1),,l,, x U(1),,e,,)^3^ flavour symmetry is enforced. 8 It notably forbids all fermion masses and Yukawa couplings except that only of the top quark. 9 The model therefore implements the five-flavour scheme for PDFs. 10 11 12 A new coupling order {{{NP=2}}} is assigned to SMEFT interactions. 13 13 The cutoff scale {{{Lambda}}} takes a default value of 1 TeV^-2^ and can be modified along with the Wilson coefficients in the {{{param_card}}}. 14 14 Operators definitions, normalisations and coefficient names in the UFO model are specified in [attachment:definitions.pdf]. 15 The notations and normali zations of top-quark operator coefficientscomply with the LHC TOP WG standards of [https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07237 1802.07237].16 Note however that the flavo r symmetry enforced here is slightly more restrictive than the baseline assumption there (see the [wiki:dim6top dim6top page] for more information).15 The notations and normalisations of top-quark operator coefficients mostly comply with the LHC TOP WG standards of [https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07237 1802.07237]. 16 Note however that the flavour symmetry enforced here is slightly more restrictive than the baseline assumption there (see the [wiki:dim6top dim6top page] for more information about differences). 17 17 This model has been validated at tree level against the {{{dim6top}}} implementation (see [https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.12310 1906.12310] and the [https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~rwgtdim6/mg5amcnlo/plugin_eft_contrib/files/head:/example/ comparison details]). 18 18 … … 21 21 === Current implementation === 22 22 23 UFO model: [attachment:SMEFTatNLO_v1.0. tar.gz]23 UFO model: [attachment:SMEFTatNLO_v1.0.1.tar.gz] 24 24 25 25 The current implementation imposes CP conservation. … … 27 27 The light-quark current operator, qqHDH, uuHDH, ddHDH, with coefficients {{{cpq3i}}}, {{{cpqMi}}}, {{{cpu}}}, {{{cpd}}} are however included. 28 28 The triple-gluon operator, with coefficient {{{cG}}}, is currently not available (see the loop-capable [wiki:GGG] implementation). 29 Vertices including more than four scalars or four leptons are not included.30 Scalar and tensor {{{QQll}}} operators, with coefficients {{{ctlS3}}}, {{{ctlT3}}}, and {{{cblS3}}}, break our flavo r symmetry assumption and are not available for one-loop computations.31 Top-quark flavo r-changing interactions, not compatible with the imposed flavor symmetry, are not included (see the loop-capable [https://feynrules.irmp.ucl.ac.be/wiki/TopFCNC TopFCNC] implementation).32 33 Unlike prescribed by the LHC TOP WG, the top quark chromomagnetic-dipole operator coefficient {{{ctG}}} is normali zed with a factor of the strong coupling, g,,S,,.34 This normali zation factor temporarily ensures compatibility with the 2.X.X series of MadGraph5_aMC@NLO but may be dropped in the future.35 As with every other appearance of this coupling in MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, its value is renormalisation-group evolved to the QCD renormali zation scale (set in the run_card).29 Vertices including four leptons or more than four scalars are not included. 30 Scalar and tensor {{{QQll}}} operators, with coefficients {{{ctlS3}}}, {{{ctlT3}}}, and {{{cblS3}}}, break our flavour symmetry assumption and are not available for one-loop computations. 31 Top-quark flavour-changing interactions, not compatible with the imposed flavour symmetry, are not included (see the loop-capable [https://feynrules.irmp.ucl.ac.be/wiki/TopFCNC TopFCNC] implementation). 32 33 Unlike prescribed by the LHC TOP WG, the top quark chromomagnetic-dipole operator coefficient {{{ctG}}} is normalised with a factor of the strong coupling, g,,S,,. 34 This normalisation factor temporarily ensures compatibility with the 2.X.X series of MadGraph5_aMC@NLO but may be dropped in the future. 35 As with every other appearance of this coupling in MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, its value is renormalisation-group evolved to the QCD renormalisation scale (set in the run_card). 36 36 37 37 38 38 Counterterms required for one-loop computations are currently included up to five points. 39 The unitary gauge (default) is re commended when computing anomalous quark-loop amplitudes like {{{ggZ}}}, {{{gggZ}}}, {{{ggZH}}} and {{{ggff}}}.40 41 42 MadGraph5_aMC@NLO does not evolve operator coefficients which are therefore kept at fixed scale {{{mueft}}} distinguished from the QCD renormali zation scale {{{MUR}}}.43 We recommend to use fixed renormali zation and factorization scales (in the {{{run_card}}}), and to set {{{mueft}}} equal to those (in the {{{param_card}}}).44 45 46 The {{{3.0.3-neworders}}} development branch ([https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~maddevelopers/mg5amcnlo/3.0.3-neworders/tarball tarball]) of MG is required for NLO predictions involving four-fermion operators and (in general) H^2^G^2^ with coefficient {{{cpG}}} not normalized with any power of g,,S,,.39 The unitary gauge (default) is required when computing anomalous quark-loop amplitudes like {{{ggZ}}}, {{{gggZ}}}, {{{ggZH}}} and {{{ggff}}}. 40 41 42 MadGraph5_aMC@NLO does not evolve operator coefficients which are therefore kept at fixed scale {{{mueft}}} distinguished from the QCD renormalisation scale {{{MUR}}}. 43 We recommend to use fixed renormalisation and factorisation scales (in the {{{run_card}}}), and to set {{{mueft}}} equal to those (in the {{{param_card}}}). 44 45 46 The {{{3.0.3-neworders}}} or {{{3.0.4}}} development branches of MG ([https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~maddevelopers/mg5amcnlo/3.0.3-neworders/tarball here] and [https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~maddevelopers/mg5amcnlo/3.0.4/tarball here]) are required for one-loop predictions involving four-quark operators and (in general) H^2^G^2^ with coefficient {{{cpG}}} not normalised with any power of g,,S,,. 47 47 It also allows for a better control over coupling orders and, in particular, for the separate computation of linear and quadratic EFT contributions at NLO. 48 It is however only available for fixed order computations (i.e. not for event generation ).48 It is however only available for fixed order computations (i.e. not for event generation, with {{{fixed_order = ON}}}). 49 49 Sufficiently coarse differential distributions can be obtained by implementing a !FixedOrderAnalysis in Fortran (see examples in the corresponding subdirectory). 50 A branch allowing for the separate computation of different orders in event-generation mode (with matching to parton shower) is being validated.50 A branch allowing for the separate computation of different orders in event-generation mode (with matching to parton shower) is currently being validated. 51 51 52 52 The 2.X.X series of MadGraph5_aMC@NLO should be used for event generation (i.e. beyond fixed-order computations). 53 It can handle bosonic and two-fermion operators at one-loop. 54 The model should in that case be loaded with a restriction card where other coefficients are set to zero. 53 It can however not handle four-quark operators at one-loop. 54 The model should in that case be loaded with the {{{no4q}}} restriction card (doing {{{import model SMEFTatNLO-no4q}}}) which excludes four-quark operator coefficients. 55 An exception is single top-quark production in which the colour singlet {{{cQq13}}} and and octet {{{cQq83}}} are available in 2.X.X. 56 For the latter, see however the specific instructions below about "loop filtering". 55 57 56 58 … … 61 63 * 2019/08/12 - v0.1: Uploaded a new version matching {{{dim6top}}} operator conventions, also some bugfixes and gs normalisation for {{{OtG}}} 62 64 * 2020/08/24 - v1.0: Official release including notably four-quark operators at NLO. 65 * 2020/12/16 - v1.0.1: Compatible with python3; BR for t,W,Z (SM and LO) in restriction cards to ease Madspin use; {{{no4q}}} restriction card without four-quark operators for use with MG v2. 63 66 64 67 === Support === … … 100 103 We recommend avoiding setting values of Wilson coefficients to 0 when computing at NLO using MadGraph5_aMC@NLO. 101 104 102 Operators should either be removed explicitly with restriction cards or set to a very small non-zero value , e.g., 1e-5.105 Operators should either be removed explicitly with restriction cards or set to a very small non-zero value in parameter cards, e.g., 1e-5. 103 106 104 107 ==== Plugin for b-quark Yukawa coupling and operator ({{{ymb}}} and {{{cbp}}}) ==== … … 109 112 Setting it to {{{True}}} restores the SM & SMEFT bottom Yukawa parameters ({{{ymb}}} and {{{cbp}}}), the bbh(h)(h) vertices, and corresponding couplings. 110 113 The bottom mass parameters, {{{MB}}}, is not restored which has a percent effect on the {{{h > b b~}}} partial width. 111 The corresponding Goldstone 114 The corresponding Goldstone-boson interactions are not included, such that the extended model can only be used in unitary gauge (default). 112 115 113 116 ==== !MadSpin 114 [https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/madgraph/wiki/MadSpin MadSpin] can be used to perform tree-level decays (accounting for leading-order spin correlations). 115 Information about the branching fractions of the decayed particles should then be included in the restriction (and/or param) card used. 116 E.g. for the top quark, Z and W bosons: 117 {{{ 118 DECAY 6 1.470800e+00 119 1.000000e+00 2 5 24 # 1.4708 120 DECAY 23 2.416039e+00 121 1.517939e-01 2 -1 1 122 1.517939e-01 2 -3 3 123 1.517939e-01 2 -5 5 124 1.176099e-01 2 -2 2 125 1.176099e-01 2 -4 4 126 6.865783e-02 2 -12 12 127 6.865783e-02 2 -14 14 128 6.865783e-02 2 -16 16 129 3.447502e-02 2 -11 11 130 3.447502e-02 2 -13 13 131 3.447502e-02 2 -15 15 132 DECAY 24 2.002950e+00 133 3.333333e-01 2 -1 2 134 3.333333e-01 2 -3 4 135 1.111111e-01 2 -11 12 136 1.111111e-01 2 -13 14 137 1.111111e-01 2 -15 16 138 }}} 139 These values can be recomputed for a given param_card by running {{{compute_widths <particle-name> --path=<input-param-card> --output=<updated-param-card>}}} after having loaded the model. 140 To ensure gauge invariance, MadGraph_aMC@NLO would still set the widths of external particles to zero (saying, e.g., "For gauge cancellation, the width of 'Z' has been set to zero") but pass the required information to !MadSpin. 141 If the operator coefficients varied affect the widths of the decayed particles, extra care must be taken to properly account for that dependence. 117 [https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/madgraph/wiki/MadSpin MadSpin] can be used to perform tree-level decays, accounting for leading-order spin correlations. 118 Information about the branching fractions of the decayed particles should then be included already in the restriction card used. 119 To ensure gauge invariance, MadGraph_aMC@NLO would still set the widths of external particles to zero (warning, e.g., that "For gauge cancellation, the width of 'Z' has been set to zero") but would pass the required information to !MadSpin. 120 From version 1.0.1 of the model, distributed {{{NLO}}} and {{{LO}}} restriction cards include the branching fraction information for top-quark, Z and W bosons. 121 These are computed in the SM, with default input parameters (Gf, MZ, MW, MT, etc.), and at tree level (consistently with the accuracy of !MadSpin). 122 If input parameters are modified from their default values, or to include SMEFT effects, these branching fractions need to be recomputed. 123 This can be done for a given {{{<input-param-card>}}} by running {{{compute_widths <particle-names> --path=<input-param-card> --output=<updated-param-card>}}} after having loaded the model. 124 The {{{<updated-param-card>}}} produced should then include branching-fraction information for the specified {{{<particle-names>}}} that is consistent with the other parameters it contains. 125 142 126 143 127 === Generation recipes for validated processes === 144 128 Among many others, the following processes are supported at the one-loop level. 145 Gauge invariance (see {{{help check}}} in MadGraph5_aMC@NLO) and pole cancellation have been checked explicitly for those. 146 Widths should be set to zero to ensure gauge invariance. 129 Gauge invariance (see {{{help check}}} in MadGraph5_aMC@NLO) and pole cancellation have been checked explicitly for those (setting all widths set to zero is then required). 147 130 For complicated processes and in case of doubts, please contact the authors. 148 131 … … 163 146 ==== Multi-boson production ==== 164 147 ''quark-initiated'' 165 166 148 {{{ 167 149 > p p > W+ W- QED=2 QCD=0 NP=2 [QCD] … … 171 153 172 154 ''loop-induced'' 173 174 155 {{{ 175 156 > g g > W+ W- QED=2 QCD=2 NP=2 [QCD] … … 205 186 206 187 When generating one of the last four processes ({{{tj}}},{{{thj}}},{{{tZj}}},{{{taj}}}) with the {{{cQq83}}} operator coefficient, all loops including a gluon have to be allowed. 207 This can be achieved with the followingmodification of MadGraph5_aMC@NLO:188 This can be achieved through "loop filtering", with the following ad-hoc modification of MadGraph5_aMC@NLO: 208 189 {{{ 209 190 === modified file 'madgraph/loop/loop_diagram_generation.py' … … 240 221 # self['loop_diagrams'] = base_objects.DiagramList( 241 222 }}} 223 The width of the W may also need to be set to zero, to ensure precise gauge invariance and pole cancellation. 242 224 243 225 ==== Analytic validation ====