6 | | |
7 | | |
8 | | = Model Database = |
9 | | |
10 | | One entry in the model DB contains: |
11 | | * unique tag, analog to arXiv: moDel:1003.0123 |
12 | | * title |
13 | | * author list |
14 | | * free text abstract |
15 | | * a classification of the model. Should not be hierarchical, since this makes multiple attachments hard. Options are |
16 | | * entirely free tagging |
17 | | * choice from a pre-set list of tags |
18 | | * model description in terms of the (versioned) input file for a specific (versioned) package |
19 | | * this combination should also already have a tool chain ID |
20 | | * list of validations that have been performed. |
21 | | * This format is described below |
22 | | * Thumbnails of plots of MC comparisons, including the tool chain ID that was used to make them |
23 | | * pointer to the main arXiv paper |
24 | | * pointers to downstream papers |
25 | | * a "supersedes moDel:0909.3210" entry |
26 | | * a sharing licence (maybe pre-defined such that only models adhering to a certain licence can enter) |
27 | | |
28 | | |
29 | | |
30 | | features of the interaction: |
31 | | * allow for a 24h period for corrections at initial upload |
32 | | * authority to modify entries lies with author |
33 | | * author can grant modification rights to validators |
34 | | * author can relinquish access rights |
35 | | * automatic opening after a time limit / max idle time? |
36 | | * a system for citation handling? |
37 | | |
38 | | |
39 | | possible uses: |
40 | | ||QUESTION||ANSWER|| |
41 | | ||specific BSM model||which papers refer to it, which validations have been done|| |
42 | | ||specific particle (maybe PDG code)||which models have it|| |