Changes between Version 30 and Version 31 of Reweight

Timestamp:

Feb 1, 2016, 4:48:12 PM (9 years ago)

Author:

Olivier Mattelaer

Comment:

--

Reweight

@@ -320 +320 @@
     ||    0.1                 ||  0.800903791291             ||  0.799 ± 0.0026   || OK ||
     ||    1                   ||  0.802209013071             ||  0.7987 ± 0.0025  || OK ||
-    ||    10                  ||  0.85200014698              ||  0.8584 ± 0.00092 || OK ||
-    ||    100                 ||  5.0238030968               ||  6.09 ± 0.0082    || '''FAIL''' ||
-    ||    100                 ||  5.04763                    ||  6.09 ± 0.0082    || '''FAIL'''  (done with a sample of 100k events) ||
+    ||    10                  ||  0.85200014698              ||  0.8584 ± 0.00092  || OK ||
+    ||    100                 ||  5.0238030968               ||  6.09 ± 0.0082    || '''FAIL (as expected)''': Require too much stats ||
+    ||    100                 ||  5.04763                    ||  6.09 ± 0.0082    || '''FAIL (as expected)''': Require too much stats  (done with a sample of 100k events) ||
     The last entry fails since the expected distribution for such value of the coupling is too different from the distribution of the Standard Model. Such discrepancy are expected in this case. One hint is that the cross-section is an order of magnitude higher than the original one (Looking at the distribution confirm this).
     The inversed reweight (i.e. starting from the CWW=100 sample of events and reweight to find back the SM) is working properly. It returned: 0.803341120226 
@@ -335 +335 @@
     ||    0.1                 ||  0.801379445746             ||  0.7988 ± 0.0023   || OK ||
     ||    1                   ||  0.806872565125             ||  0.8065 ± 0.0023  || OK ||
-    ||    10                  ||  0.889336417677             ||  0.8832 ± 0.003 || OK ||
-    ||    100                 ||  4.46724081967              ||  4.519 ± 0.015    || '''FAIL''' ||
-    ||    100                 ||  4.44273                    ||  4.519 ± 0.015    || '''FAIL'''  (done with a sample of 100k events) ||
+    ||    10                  ||  0.889336417677             ||  0.8832 ± 0.003  || OK ||
+    ||    100                 ||  4.46724081967              ||  4.519 ± 0.015    || '''FAIL (as expected) ''' ||
+    ||    100                 ||  4.44273                    ||  4.519 ± 0.015    || '''FAIL (as expected)'''  (done with a sample of 100k events) ||
     Same comment as for the previous coupling.
 
@@ -345 +345 @@
     ||    0.1                 ||  0.800782626532             ||  0.7985 ± 0.0024    || OK ||
     ||    1                   ||  0.800626859275             ||  0.7981 +- 0.002365  || OK ||
-    ||    10                  ||  0.799127987884             ||  0.7971 ± 0.0024 || OK ||
+    ||    10                  ||  0.799127987884             ||  0.7971 ± 0.0024  || OK ||
     ||    100                 ||  0.790019392142             ||  0.7852 ± 0.0026    || OK ||
     ||    100                 ||  0.786698206995             ||  0.7852 ± 0.0026    || OK  (done with a sample of 100k events) ||