Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of LightPseudo


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Mar 20, 2012, 4:18:02 PM (13 years ago)
Author:
trac
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • LightPseudo

    v1 v1  
     1
     2
     3== %$ h \rightarrow A^0A^0 \rightarrow b\overline{b} \tau^+\tau^-$% in VBF at LHC (Les Houches Project)  ==
     4
     5=== Hypothesis ===
     6
     7We assume SM-like weak vector boson fusion production of %$h$% with a xsec of order 2 to 4 pb depending on the mass. NLO corrections are available but have been shown to be small (typically of order 5 to 10% at most). We assume that %$Br(h\rightarrow A^0 A^0)=1$%. It is a simplifying hypothesis, often justified from the theoretical point of view (%$A^0$% is much heavier than light fermions). Anyway, if it's not true, all signal xsec should simply be scaled by this Br.
     8
     9We also assume that %$A^0$% is a Higgs like scalar coupling to the mass, so that
     10
     11
     12
     13Numerically, this gives %$Br(A^0\rightarrow \tau^+\tau^-)=8\%$% and %$Br(A^0\rightarrow b\overline{b})=92\%$% if one takes %$m_b=3.5$% Gev which is a reasonable value at the scale %$m_{A^0}$%. These BR could be modified if the coupling of %$A^0$% to charm is sizable, but this is not the case with SM like couplings or in large %$\tan(\beta)$% type II models like MSSM.
     14
     15The total BR for the decay chain %$ h \rightarrow A^0A^0 \rightarrow b\overline{b} \tau^+\tau^-$% is thus 2 * 8% * 92%=15%, and the typical xsec is thus ranging from 300 to 450 fb.
     16
     17=== Benchmark point ===
     18
     19For the LH project, we take %$m_{A^0}$% at 50 Gev and %$m_{h}$% at 120 Gev. The mass of the %$h$% is light enough to have a good production xsec and to avoid to consider its decays into WW or ZZ. The mass of the %$A^0$% is light enough to open the decay %$h\rightarrow A^0 A^0$% but heavy enough to give a good pT and a good separation for b's and tau's.
     20
     21=== Monte Carlo production ===
     22
     23==== Methodology ====
     24
     25Signal and backgrounds are generated separately using MG/ME v4.1. The PDF is CTEQ6L1 and the renormalization and factorization scales are set to 120 Gev. All the following generation cuts are applied. Jet means non b jets and leptons means e, %$\mu$% and %$\tau$%.
     26
     27   * Minimal pT of 20 Gev for the jets and 10 Gev for leptons and b's
     28   * Maximum rapidity of 5 for jets and 2.5 for leptons and b's
     29   * Minimal deltaR>0.3 for all objects
     30   * Maximal invariant mass of 80 Gev for the tau's pair (to avoid the Z peak)
     31   * Minimal invariant mass of 700 Gev for the two jets (VBF cut)
     32   * Delta eta >4 for the two jets (VBF cut)
     33
     34==== Signal ====
     35
     36100k events with tau's decayed into leptons only: [http://madgraph.phys.ucl.ac.be/MadGraphData/mherquet@fyma.ucl.ac.be/Decay/signal_out.lhe.gz Events]
     37
     38The cross section '''after tau decay''' into leptons is 9.5fb. There is '''no cut''' on the tau decay products. Plots before tau decay are [http://madgraph.hep.uiuc.edu/MadGraphData/mherquet@fyma.ucl.ac.be/PROC4/Events/run_06_plots.html here].
     39
     40If you need to split LHEF files, please use Software.SplitEvents
     41
     42==== Considered backgrounds ====
     43
     44===== Irreducible: QCD %$2\tau 2b 2j$% background =====
     45
     4644k events with tau's decayed into leptons only
     47[http://madgraph.phys.ucl.ac.be/MadGraphData/mherquet@fyma.ucl.ac.be/Decay/bkg_2tau2b2j_out_out.lhe.gz Events]
     48
     49The cross section '''after tau decay''' into leptons is 1fb. There is '''no cut''' on the tau decay products. Plots before tau decay are [http://madgraph.phys.ucl.ac.be/MadGraphData/mherquet@fyma.ucl.ac.be/PROC1/Events/run_01_plots.html here].
     50
     51===== Nearly irreducible QCD %$2e 2b 2j$% and %$2mu 2b 2j$% background =====
     52
     53Irreducible if no tau tag and no missing Et cut. Cross section is 8.7fb (for each) with cuts on leptons same as cuts on tau's for signal.
     54
     55A 25k events '''muon''' sample: [http://madgraph.phys.ucl.ac.be/MadGraphData/mherquet@fyma.ucl.ac.be/PROC7/Events/bkg_2mu2b2j_1.lhe.gz Events] 
     56
     57Another 26k events '''muon''' sample
     58[http://madgraph.phys.ucl.ac.be/MadGraphData/mherquet@fyma.ucl.ac.be/PROC7/Events/bkg_2mu2b2j_2.lhe.gz Events]
     59
     60I propose to use one of these two '''muon samples''' as an electron sample (just need to switch the PDG code in the LHEF file since the kinematic is the same).
     61
     62Some [http://madgraph.phys.ucl.ac.be/MadGraphData/mherquet@fyma.ucl.ac.be/PROC7/Events/run_02_plots.html Plots] for the whole 50k sample.
     63
     64===== Reducible tt + 2j with t>Wb and both W going to e, mu or tau and tau going to e or mu  =====
     65
     66
     67A 100k event sample with W's in e or mu (xsec=2300fb): [http://madgraph.phys.ucl.ac.be/MadGraphData/mherquet@fyma.ucl.ac.be/Decay/run_03_unweighted_events_out.lhe.gz Events]
     68
     69A 50k event sample with W+ in tau's (and tau+ in e or mu) and W- in e or mu (xsec=404fb):
     70[http://madgraph.phys.ucl.ac.be/MadGraphData/mherquet@fyma.ucl.ac.be/Decay/run_04_1_unweighted_events_out.lhe.gz Events]
     71
     72A 50k event sample with W- in tau's (and tau- in e or mu) and W+ in e or mu (xsec=404fb):
     73[http://madgraph.phys.ucl.ac.be/MadGraphData/mherquet@fyma.ucl.ac.be/Decay/run_04_2_unweighted_events_out.lhe.gz Events]
     74
     75A 50k event sample with W- and W+ in tau's (and tau's in e or mu) (xsec=70fb): [http://madgraph.phys.ucl.ac.be/MadGraphData/mherquet@fyma.ucl.ac.be/Decay/run_04_3_unweighted_events_out.lhe.gz Events], another one [http://madgraph.phys.ucl.ac.be/MadGraphData/mherquet@fyma.ucl.ac.be/Decay/run_04_4_unweighted_events_out.lhe.gz Events]
     76
     77Without any cut on leptonic final state, the total xsec is 3200 fb! But the kinematic is '''very''' different for both leptons pairs and b pairs, large invariant masses and large deltaR are typically preferred. Also, there is a lot (half of it if I'm right) of mismatched pairs e-mu (instead of e-e or mu-mu) which should be easy to remove. The amount of Et is also typically much higher (neutrinos are coming from W's), so a max Et cut should also be rather efficient. So there is maybe a hope...
     78
     79==== Not considered backgrounds ====
     80
     81===== QED (i.e. alpha_EW^4) backgrounds =====
     82Should be small (see [http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0702119 this paper]) and anyway impossible to simulate completely.
     83
     84===== QCD %$2b 4j$% background for jets faking tau's =====
     85
     86Not considered here since tau's are decaying into leptons.
     87
     88===== 2ta4j without b's (mistagging) =====
     89
     90Probably not necessary. CMS TDR I gives a b mistagging probability around %$10^{-2}$% for gluons and light quark jets (for a tagging efficiency of 0.5) and %$10^{-1}$% for c jets. The cross sections of 2ta4j and 2ta2c2j with the strong VBF cuts are probably to small to give sizable contribution after double mistag.
     91
     92==== Summary of the situation... ====
     93A 10fb signal with a 1fb irreducible bkg, two 9fb nearly irreducible background which could be efficiently cut by a mass window on leptons and a delta R cut on b's. A huge 3.2 pb tt background with very different kinematic but same final state...
     94
     95=== References ===
     96
     97A good generic reference for VBF is the corresponding section in [http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0503172 Djouadi]. It gives different references for experimental analysis of %$h\rightarrow \tau^+\tau^-$% in VBF which could be considered as a good starting point (but ATLAS related!).
     98
     99==== Les Houches 02 proceeding: ====
     100[http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0203056 Azuleos]
     101
     102==== ATLAS notes ====
     103[http://doc.cern.ch//archive/electronic/cern/others/atlnot/Note/phys/phys-2002-018.pdf phys-2002-018]
     104[http://doc.cern.ch//archive/electronic/cern/others/atlnot/Note/phys/phys-2003-004.pdf phys-2002-004]
     105
     106==== Parton level Papers: ====
     107
     108   *  [attachment:e014037.pdf PRD59 014037]
     109
     110   *  [attachment:e093005.pdf PRD61 093005]
     111
     112PLB454 297
     113
     114==== CMS  ====
     115
     116To be checked: Physics TDR and Notes
     117
     118=== Why is it interesting ? ===
     119
     120Theoretical point of view: if %$m_{A^0}>2 m_b$%, most of NMSSM signal with only tau's and mu's decays are suppressed.
     121
     122Pheno point of view: signal xsec similar to (or even better than) SM one for VBF with h in tau's which has been shown to be a quite interesting channel (4.5 sigmas in each tau's leptonic mode, 6 sigmas for the combined analysis after 30 fb-1). Jet veto cannot be applied straightforward but a "non b jet" veto is an interesting new concept (check if it is new!). The additional double b tag could maybe compensate the less effective background rejection without decreasing too much the signal (25%).
     123
     124=== Final Version of our paper ===
     125
     126   * [attachment:VBF_hAA2b2ta.pdf pdf]: Our contribution to Les Houches Proceedings
     127 
     128 
     129
     130
     131
     132   
     133
     134
     135
     136
     137
     138
     139
     140
     141
     142
     143
     144
     145
     146
     147
     148
     149
     150
     151
     152
     153
     154
     155
     156
     157
     158
     159
     160
     161
     162
     163