Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of GravitonPlusJets


Ignore:
Timestamp:
May 2, 2012, 5:44:50 PM (13 years ago)
Author:
Olivier Mattelaer
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • GravitonPlusJets

    v2 v3  
    9898First we show each matched results via its MatchChecker report. We also show here the comparative plots in which we compare (for each ADD run) the matched result with the NLO/LO result, given the K factor of normalization.
    9999====== + a) MatchChecker reports ======
    100 <table style="width: 561px; height: 1304px;" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0" border="1"> <tbody> <tr> <td>**g>Model[[br]]**</td> <td>**g>Parameters[[br]]**</td> <td> '''Name of the Run''' </td> <td>**g>Plots[[br]]**</td> </tr> <tr> <td rowspan="6">ADD</td> <td rowspan="2">
     100{{{
     101#!html
     102
     103<table style="width: 561px; height: 1304px;" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0" border="1"> <tbody>
     104<tr> <th>Model<BR>---------------------</th> <th>Parameters<BR>---------------------</th> <td> Name of the Run<BR>--------------------- </td> <th>Plots<BR>---------------------</th> </tr>
     105<tr> <td rowspan="6">ADD</td> <td rowspan="2">
    101106
    102107L_ADD = 5 TeV
    … …  
    157162
    158163</td> </tr> </tbody> </table>
     164}}}
    159165
    160166====== + b) Comparative plots: NLO/LO & matching results ======
    161167
    162 ||
    163  
    164 DD model</p> || <p>[attachment:Results_LHC_d2.pdf LHC Comparative plot (PtGrav) for d=2]</p> <p>[attachment:Results_LHC_d4.pdf LHC Comparative plot (PtGrav) for d=4]</p> <p>[attachment:Results_LHC_d6.pdf LHC Comparative plot (PtGrav) for d=6]</p> <p> </p> <p>[attachment:Results_LHC_ADD.pdf LHC combined comparative plot]</p> ||
    165 || || ||
    166 || Massless grav. model ||
    167  
    168 attachment:Results_LHC_Ml.pdf LHC combined comparative plot]</p> <p> </p> ||
    169 || || ||
    170 || RS model ||
    171  
    172 </p> <p>[attachment:Results_LHC_RS.pdf LHC combined comparative plot]</p> <p> </p> ||
     168|| DD model || [attachment:Results_LHC_d2.pdf LHC Comparative plot (PtGrav) for d=2][attachment:Results_LHC_d4.pdf LHC Comparative plot (PtGrav) for d=4] [attachment:Results_LHC_d6.pdf LHC Comparative plot (PtGrav) for d=6][attachment:Results_LHC_ADD.pdf LHC combined comparative plot] ||
     169|| Massless grav. model || [attachment:Results_LHC_Ml.pdf LHC combined comparative plot] ||
     170|| RS model || [attachment:Results_LHC_RS.pdf LHC combined comparative plot] ||
    173171====== + c) Jet Rates for the LHC samples ======
    174172
    175 ||
    176  
    177 DD model</p> || <p>[attachment:JetRates_ADD.pdf Jet rates]</p> ||
    178 || || ||
    179 || Massless grav. model ||
    180  
    181 attachment:JetRates_Ml.pdf Jet rates]</p> ||
    182 || || ||
    183 || RS model ||
    184  
    185 attachment:JetRates_RS.pdf Jet rates]</p> ||
     173
     174|| DD model ||[attachment:JetRates_ADD.pdf Jet rates] ||
     175|| Massless grav. model || [attachment:JetRates_Ml.pdf Jet rates] ||
     176|| RS model || [attachment:JetRates_RS.pdf Jet rates] ||
    186177
    187178PS. The number of events is normalized by the total number of events of each run.
    … …  
    224215For reference, the cuts in 0911.5095 (NLO QCD corrections to G+monojet) are the following:
    225216
    226    * '''LHC''': PTmiss>500GeV; ||\eta_j||<4.5
    227    * '''Tevatron''': PTmiss>120GeV; harder jet : Ptj>150GeV with ||\eta_j||<1; softer jet with PT>60GeV, ||\eta_j||<3.6 is vetoed.
    228 
     217   * '''LHC''': PTmiss>500GeV; $|\eta_j|<4.5$
     218   * '''Tevatron''': PTmiss>120GeV; harder jet : Ptj>150GeV with $|\eta_j|<1$; softer jet with PT>60GeV, $|\eta_j|<3.6$ is vetoed.
    229219   * mur=muf= Pt graviton
    230220   * 5 quark flavors considered
    … …  
    233223
    234224'''In the NLO work, indeed different jet algorithm from the one chosen in MG/ME is used, see the jet definition on page 5 of 0911.5095:'''
    235 <blockquote>
    236 
    237    *
    238  
    239 '''For the LHC, "the jets are defined by the K_T algorithm with D=0.6, and are required to satisfy ||\eta_j||<4.5 and PTj>50GeV"''' </p>
    240    *
    241  
    242 '''For the Tevatron,"jets are defined by the K_T algorithm with D=0.7, and are required to satisfy ||\eta_j||<3.6 and PTj>20GeV"''' </p>
    243 </blockquote>
    244 
    245 '''Here D is just the jet cone separation Drjj, so should we set Drjj cut futher to the matched results, in order to compare with the NLO ones?'''
     225
     226
     227   * For the LHC, "the jets are defined by the K_T algorithm with D=0.6, and are required to satisfy $|\eta_j|<4.5$ and $PTj>50GeV$
     228   * For the Tevatron,"jets are defined by the K_T algorithm with D=0.7, and are required to satisfy $|\eta_j|<3.6 and PTj>20GeV$
     229   * Here D is just the jet cone separation Drjj, so should we set Drjj cut futher to the matched results, in order to compare with the NLO ones?
    246230
    247231In the matching procedure, the separation between jets is defined by the xqcut and pythia's QCUT parameters. We have to set Drjj to zero in the run_card.dat.
    248232
    249 <strong>[[br]]**
     233
    250234=== VI. References ===
    251235