| | 3 | |
| | 4 | ||= Students =|| || || || || || || |
| | 5 | ||= Supervisor(s) =|| || || || || || || |
| | 6 | |
| | 7 | |
| | 8 | == 1. Analysis summary == |
| | 9 | |
| | 10 | == 2. Analysis global information == |
| | 11 | |
| | 12 | * Collaboration: |
| | 13 | * Center of mass energy: |
| | 14 | * Integrated luminosity: |
| | 15 | * Link to arXiv: none |
| | 16 | * Link to the collaboration page: |
| | 17 | * Link to CDS: |
| | 18 | * Link to Inspire: |
| | 19 | * Other useful links... |
| | 20 | |
| | 21 | == 3. Selection description == |
| | 22 | |
| | 23 | === 3.1 Trigger selection === |
| | 24 | |
| | 25 | PS: This part cannot usually be described by the fast-simulation of detector. |
| | 26 | |
| | 27 | === 3.2 Object definition === |
| | 28 | |
| | 29 | Explained here how the objects are defined. |
| | 30 | |
| | 31 | === 3.3 Cut-flow chart === |
| | 32 | |
| | 33 | === 3.4 Definition of exotic observables === |
| | 34 | |
| | 35 | Like SUSY transverse observable. Notice that classical MT2 & MT2W are encoded within the !MadAnalysis framework. |
| | 36 | |
| | 37 | == 3. Detector simulation == |
| | 38 | |
| | 39 | Can we use the last release of the Delphes package with the CMS/ATLAS MA5tune-card? or do need to improve the simulation? |
| | 40 | |
| | 41 | == 4. Validation material == |
| | 42 | |
| | 43 | === 4.1 Monte-Carlo samples === |
| | 44 | |
| | 45 | * LO/NLO? |
| | 46 | * Model used: |
| | 47 | * MC generator program (name + version): |
| | 48 | * Shower program (name + version): |
| | 49 | * Tune of Pythia: |
| | 50 | * PDF set: |
| | 51 | * ME/PS merging???? |
| | 52 | |
| | 53 | === 4.2 Reference plots / cut-flows === |
| | 54 | |
| | 55 | * List of validation material |
| | 56 | |
| | 57 | == 4. Validation results == |
| | 58 | |
| | 59 | == 5. Reinterpretation (optional) == |
| | 60 | |
| | 61 | == 6. Questions / issues == |
| | 62 | |
| | 63 | |
