7 | | This investigation is meant to study the parton distribution functions (`PDF`) being used in the [[http://www.desy.de/~heramc/programs/lpair/lpair.pdf|LPAIR Monte Carlo generator]] w.r.t. the inelastic collision when the incoming proton breaks up into a hadronic final state. This analysis was motivated by the observation of a deficit on the number of events in the transverse momentum (p,,T,,) distributions of dimuons from data when compated to the predictions from `LPAIR` (Figure 6 in [[http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1305.5596|CMS-FSQ-12-010]]). A possible reason for such disagreement may be related to the PDF being employed by `LPAIR` to compute the contribution of proton dissociation. |
8 | | |
9 | | There are currently two versions of this Monte Carlo generator (which can be found [[http://cmssw.cvs.cern.ch/cgi-bin/cmssw.cgi/UserCode/Forthomme/lpair/|here]]) studying two different kind of processes: |
10 | | |
11 | | 1. `DESY` version: developed for electron-proton collisions in HERA, with built-in option for proton-proton collisions as //test//. This version allows one to study elastic and inelastic (single dissociation) processes for the production of dileptons; and |
12 | | |
13 | | 2. `CDF` version: improved version which allows one to study elastic and double dissociation processes with more phase-space cuts available. |
14 | | |
15 | | In this current analysis, we focus in the exclusive dimuon production, γγ -> μ^+^μ^-^, in inelastic collisions (single dissociation). LPAIR makes use of the [[http://home.thep.lu.se/~torbjorn/pythiaaux/introduction.html|JetSet]] library present in [[http://home.thep.lu.se/~torbjorn/pythiaaux/present.html|Pythia]] in order to perform the hadronization of the proton remnants. |
16 | | |
17 | | The built-in options for proton dissociation in LPAIR make use of two parametrizations for the parton densities inside the proton, namely: |
18 | | |
19 | | 1. `SURI-YENNIE` [[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003491672902424|Ann. of Phys. 72 (1972) 243]] with option `11`; and |
20 | | |
21 | | 2. `BRASSE` [[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0550321376902315|Nucl. Phys. B110 (1976) 413]] with option `12` in the `LPAIR` card. This parametrization is restricted: M,,X,, < 2 GeV and Q^2^ < 5 GeV^2^. |
22 | | |
23 | | Due to the larger hadronic masses and p,,T,, distributions of the dimuon pair probed in the LHC kinematical regime, we employ SURI-YENNIE in this analysis. |
24 | | |
25 | | Following the implementation made by Dariusz Bocian (IFJ-PAN, Krakow) [[http://th-www.if.uj.edu.pl/acta/vol35/abs/v35p2417.htm|Acta Phys. Polon. B35 (2004) 2417]], the current `LPAIR` code (`DESY` version) was modified in order to account for the proton-nucleus collisions from previous studies. Then, LPAIR samples are produced as `HBOOK` files, which have to be converted to `ROOT` files using the [[http://root.cern.ch/root/HowtoConvert.html|h2root]] script provided by [[http://root.cern.ch/drupal/|ROOT]]. |
26 | | |
27 | | In case one has several `ROOT` files to merge, the [[http://root.cern.ch/drupal/content/how-merge-histogram-files|hadd]] script is employed. |
28 | | |
29 | | |
30 | | == Set up == |
31 | | |
32 | | === Code changes === |
33 | | |
34 | | A few changes are made in the code to have access to more information about the particles in the event sample produced in `LPAIR`, especially to distinguish the muons from the exclusive production from the remnants from the proton break up. Then, two changes are made in the file //ilpair-cms-pp.f// in order to store information from `JetSet` in the `HBOOK` files: |
35 | | |
36 | | 1. particle status code, //ks//, at line 246; and |
37 | | |
38 | | 2. particle parentage, //icode//, at line 248. |
39 | | |
40 | | Also, taking advantage for the fact that `LPAIR` performs the theoretical calculation in terms of Q^2^, the p,,T,, cut is internally applied by means of a Q^2^ cut in file //peripp.f// at line 29. |
41 | | |
42 | | |
43 | | === Event samples === |
44 | | |
45 | | The samples are produced with 1 million (1M) events, to check the shape of all kinematic distributions, and 5 million (5M) events in order to have enough statistics for high-p,,T,, dimuons. For the former, the samples are produced by merging ten sub-samples containing 100k events, which are obtained by running `LPAIR` at a time. while for the latter, five samples of 1M events by applying cuts on Q^2^: 0-1, 1-5, 5-20, 20-50, and 50-100 GeV^2^. The production of each of the sample with 1M events follows the same procedure as for 1M events for the whole Q^2^ range. |
46 | | |
47 | | It is worth to notice that the histograms in the distributions with 5M events are **stacked**, and each individual set of events can be distinguished by the lines crossing vertically the histogram. |
48 | | |
49 | | |
50 | | === Structure functions === |
51 | | |
52 | | The W,,1,, and W,,2,, structure functions are defined in terms of the parton densities in the proton: |
53 | | |
54 | | F,,2,, = (4/9)*(u,,val,, + 2*u,,sea,,) + (1/9)*(d,,val,, + 2*d,,sea,,) + (1/9)*2*s,,sea,, |
55 | | |
56 | | F,,1,, = F,,2,,/2x |
57 | | |
58 | | with Q^2^ = Q^2^,,min,, for the region below the Q^2^,,min,, of each parametrization. |
59 | | |
60 | | The built-in PDFs in `LPAIR` are replaced by two paramatrizations for the parton densities: |
61 | | |
62 | | 1. Glueck-Reya-Vogt (`GRV`) [[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s100520050289|Eur. Phys. J. '''C5''' (1998) 461]]: version `GRV95` at leading order (`LO`) in α,,s,,. |
63 | | |
64 | | * 0.4 < Q^2^/GeV^2^ < 1.E6; |
65 | | * 1.E-5 < x < 1. |
66 | | |
67 | | [[source:trunk/plots/PDFs/GRV/README|README]] |
68 | | |
69 | | 2. Parametrization by Fiore et al [[http://epja.epj.org/articles/epja/abs/2002/10/100500505/100500505.html|Eur. Phys. J. '''A15''' (2002) 505]]. |
70 | | |
71 | | >**Abstract**: An explicit model realizing parton-hadron duality and fiting the data is suggested. Complex nonlinear Regge trajectories are important ingredients of the |
72 | | >model. The inclusion of ∆ and N^∗^ trajectories should account for all resonances in the direct channel. The exotic trajectory is responsible for the smooth background. |
73 | | |
74 | | This parametrization is meant to fit the data for the low Q^2^ region, reproducing the resonances of low-mass mesons. The figure below shows the distribution F,,2,, vs. `x` for Q^2^ = 0.5 GeV^2^: |
75 | | |
76 | | [[Image(source:/trunk/plots/FIORE_F2_x.png, 500px)]] |
77 | | |
78 | | 3. Parametrization by `Martin-Ryskin-Stirling-Thorne` (`MRST` 2001) at leading order [[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269302014831|Phys. Lett. '''B531''' (2002) 216]] |
79 | | |
80 | | * 1.25 < Q^2^/GeV^2^ < 1.E6; |
81 | | * 1.E-5 < x < 1. |
82 | | |
83 | | [[source:trunk/plots/PDFs/MRST2001/README|README]] |
84 | | |
85 | | 4. Parametrization by `Martin-Stirling-Thorne-Watt` (`MSTW` 2008) at leading order [[http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140%2Fepjc%2Fs10052-009-1072-5| Eur. Phys. J. '''C63''' (2009) 189]] |
86 | | |
87 | | * 1.25 < Q^2^/GeV^2^ < 1.E7; |
88 | | * 1.E-5 < x < 1. |
89 | | |
90 | | [[source:trunk/plots/PDFs/MSTW2008/README|README]] |
91 | | |
92 | | === Variables === |
93 | | |
94 | | The final-state kinematics is used to make the distributions in terms of the variables of the interacting particles, like the photon virtuality, Q^2^, by: |
95 | | |
96 | | > Q^2^ = [P,,p,,(E)-p,,rem,,(E)]^2^-[P,,p,,(x)-p,,rem,,(x)]^2^-[P,,p,,(y)-p,,rem,,(y)]^2^-[P,,p,,(z)-p,,rem,,(z)]^2^ |
97 | | |
98 | | and the momentum fraction of the proton carried by the photon, x, by |
99 | | |
100 | | > x = Q^2^/(M,,X,,^2^-M,,p,,^2^+Q^2^), |
101 | | |
102 | | with ξ given by |
103 | | |
104 | | > ξ=`log`,,10,,(x) |
105 | | |
106 | | === Comparison between W,,1,, and W,,2,, Structure Functions === |
107 | | |
108 | | [[https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/LpairAnalysis/wiki/W1W2StructFunc|Distributions]] |
109 | | |
110 | | |
111 | | == Results == |
112 | | |
113 | | === No experimental cuts === |
114 | | |
115 | | ==== Cross sections ==== |
116 | | |
117 | | The predicted cross sections using each PDF for the parton densities are: |
118 | | |
119 | | ||= **PDF** =||= **Cross section (pb)** =|| |
120 | | ||= **`SURI-YENNIE`** =|| 9262. || |
121 | | ||= **`FIORE`** =|| 10557. || |
122 | | ||= **`GRV`** =|| 7749. || |
123 | | |
124 | | and when producing the sub-samples by Q^2^ cuts: |
125 | | |
126 | | ||= **PDF** =||||||||||= **Cross section (pb)** =|| |
127 | | ||= Q^2^ (GeV^2^) =||= 0-1. =||= 1.-5. =||= 5.-20. =||= 20.-50. =||= 50.-100. =|| |
128 | | ||= **`SURI-YENNIE`** =|| 3379.41 || 387.51 || 73.95 || 13.10 || 3.86 || |
129 | | ||= **`FIORE`** =|| 4140.11 || 747.88 || 40.18 || 0.477 || 0.0124 || |
130 | | ||= **`GRV`** =|| 2439.74 || 484.31 || 105.41 || 19.22 || 5.51 || |
131 | | |
132 | | ==== Distributions ==== |
133 | | |
134 | | The kinematic distributions are presented below for the sets of 1M and 5M events considering the possibilities for the parton densities. |
135 | | |
136 | | OneMillionEvents |
137 | | |
138 | | FiveMillionEvents |
139 | | |
140 | | One should notice that the samples with 5M events show different distributions w.r.t. the fact that the five regions are produced with Q^2^ cuts, which comnpletely changes the p,,T,, distributions of the dileptons. |
141 | | |
142 | | |
143 | | === Experimental cuts === |
144 | | |
145 | | In order to have results closer to the observed results in the data analysis, event samples are produced within the experimental acceptance used for at trigger level in CMS: |
146 | | |
147 | | 1. p,,T,,(μ) > 15. GeV; |
148 | | |
149 | | 2. |η(μ)| < 2.5; |
150 | | |
151 | | 3. M(μ^+^μ^-^) > 20. GeV. |
152 | | |
153 | | ==== Cross sections ==== |
154 | | |
155 | | ||= **PDF** =||||= **Cross section (pb)** =|| |
156 | | ||= M,,X,max,, =||= 100 GeV =||= 300 GeV =|| |
157 | | ||= **`SURI-YENNIE`** =|| 0.82 || 0.87 || |
158 | | ||= **`GRV`** =|| 0.92 || 1.01 || |
159 | | |
160 | | ==== Distributions ==== |
161 | | |
162 | | The first set of plots shows the events restricted to a hadronic system with mass lower than **100 GeV**, while the second consider masses up to **300 GeV**. |
163 | | |
164 | | [[https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/LpairAnalysis/wiki/1MevtCutsMx100GeV|SURI-GRV: Distributions with 1M events for Mx > 100 GeV]] |
165 | | |
166 | | [[https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/LpairAnalysis/wiki/1MevtCutsMx300GeV|SURI-GRV: Distributions with 1M events for Mx > 300 GeV]] |
167 | | |
168 | | [[https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/LpairAnalysis/wiki/5MevtSURIGRVCutsMx300GeV|SURI-GRV: Distributions with 5M events for Mx > 300 GeV]] |
169 | | |
170 | | [[https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/LpairAnalysis/wiki/5MevtSURIGRVMRSTMSTWCutsMx300GeV|MRSTlo-MSTWlo-MSTWnlo: Distributions with 5M events for Mx > 300 GeV]] |
171 | | |
172 | | |
173 | | === Ratio === |
174 | | |
175 | | The comparisons are performed by the ratio between the distributions with experimental acceptance for the `SURI-YENNIE` and `GRV` parametrizations: |
176 | | |
177 | | [[https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/LpairAnalysis/wiki/RatioSURIGRVCutsMx300GeV|Ratio between SURI and GRV]] |
178 | | |
179 | | [[https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/LpairAnalysis/wiki/RatioSURIGRVMSTWMRSTCutsMx300GeV|Ratio between SURI, GRV, MSTW and MRST]] and normalized by the production cross section [[https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/LpairAnalysis/wiki/RatioXsecSURIGRVMSTWMRSTCutsMx300GeV|here]] |
180 | | |
181 | | == LPAIR++ == |
182 | | |
183 | | to be added |