| 7 | | This investigation is meant to study the parton distribution functions (`PDF`) being used in the [[http://www.desy.de/~heramc/programs/lpair/lpair.pdf|LPAIR Monte Carlo generator]] w.r.t. the inelastic collision when the incoming proton breaks up into a hadronic final state. This analysis was motivated by the observation of a deficit on the number of events in the transverse momentum (p,,T,,) distributions of dimuons from data when compated to the predictions from `LPAIR` (Figure 6 in [[http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1305.5596|CMS-FSQ-12-010]]). A possible reason for such disagreement may be related to the PDF being employed by `LPAIR` to compute the contribution of proton dissociation. |
| 8 | | |
| 9 | | There are currently two versions of this Monte Carlo generator (which can be found [[http://cmssw.cvs.cern.ch/cgi-bin/cmssw.cgi/UserCode/Forthomme/lpair/|here]]) studying two different kind of processes: |
| 10 | | |
| 11 | | 1. `DESY` version: developed for electron-proton collisions in HERA, with built-in option for proton-proton collisions as //test//. This version allows one to study elastic and inelastic (single dissociation) processes for the production of dileptons; and |
| 12 | | |
| 13 | | 2. `CDF` version: improved version which allows one to study elastic and double dissociation processes with more phase-space cuts available. |
| 14 | | |
| 15 | | In this current analysis, we focus in the exclusive dimuon production, γγ -> μ^+^μ^-^, in inelastic collisions (single dissociation). LPAIR makes use of the [[http://home.thep.lu.se/~torbjorn/pythiaaux/introduction.html|JetSet]] library present in [[http://home.thep.lu.se/~torbjorn/pythiaaux/present.html|Pythia]] in order to perform the hadronization of the proton remnants. |
| 16 | | |
| 17 | | The built-in options for proton dissociation in LPAIR make use of two parametrizations for the parton densities inside the proton, namely: |
| 18 | | |
| 19 | | 1. `SURI-YENNIE` [[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003491672902424|Ann. of Phys. 72 (1972) 243]] with option `11`; and |
| 20 | | |
| 21 | | 2. `BRASSE` [[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0550321376902315|Nucl. Phys. B110 (1976) 413]] with option `12` in the `LPAIR` card. This parametrization is restricted: M,,X,, < 2 GeV and Q^2^ < 5 GeV^2^. |
| 22 | | |
| 23 | | Due to the larger hadronic masses and p,,T,, distributions of the dimuon pair probed in the LHC kinematical regime, we employ SURI-YENNIE in this analysis. |
| 24 | | |
| 25 | | Following the implementation made by Dariusz Bocian (IFJ-PAN, Krakow) [[http://th-www.if.uj.edu.pl/acta/vol35/abs/v35p2417.htm|Acta Phys. Polon. B35 (2004) 2417]], the current `LPAIR` code (`DESY` version) was modified in order to account for the proton-nucleus collisions from previous studies. Then, LPAIR samples are produced as `HBOOK` files, which have to be converted to `ROOT` files using the [[http://root.cern.ch/root/HowtoConvert.html|h2root]] script provided by [[http://root.cern.ch/drupal/|ROOT]]. |
| 26 | | |
| 27 | | In case one has several `ROOT` files to merge, the [[http://root.cern.ch/drupal/content/how-merge-histogram-files|hadd]] script is employed. |
| 28 | | |
| 29 | | |
| 30 | | == Set up == |
| 31 | | |
| 32 | | === Code changes === |
| 33 | | |
| 34 | | A few changes are made in the code to have access to more information about the particles in the event sample produced in `LPAIR`, especially to distinguish the muons from the exclusive production from the remnants from the proton break up. Then, two changes are made in the file //ilpair-cms-pp.f// in order to store information from `JetSet` in the `HBOOK` files: |
| 35 | | |
| 36 | | 1. particle status code, //ks//, at line 246; and |
| 37 | | |
| 38 | | 2. particle parentage, //icode//, at line 248. |
| 39 | | |
| 40 | | Also, taking advantage for the fact that `LPAIR` performs the theoretical calculation in terms of Q^2^, the p,,T,, cut is internally applied by means of a Q^2^ cut in file //peripp.f// at line 29. |
| 41 | | |
| 42 | | |
| 43 | | === Event samples === |
| 44 | | |
| 45 | | The samples are produced with 1 million (1M) events, to check the shape of all kinematic distributions, and 5 million (5M) events in order to have enough statistics for high-p,,T,, dimuons. For the former, the samples are produced by merging ten sub-samples containing 100k events, which are obtained by running `LPAIR` at a time. while for the latter, five samples of 1M events by applying cuts on Q^2^: 0-1, 1-5, 5-20, 20-50, and 50-100 GeV^2^. The production of each of the sample with 1M events follows the same procedure as for 1M events for the whole Q^2^ range. |
| 46 | | |
| 47 | | It is worth to notice that the histograms in the distributions with 5M events are **stacked**, and each individual set of events can be distinguished by the lines crossing vertically the histogram. |
| 48 | | |
| 49 | | |
| 50 | | === Structure functions === |
| 51 | | |
| 52 | | The W,,1,, and W,,2,, structure functions are defined in terms of the parton densities in the proton: |
| 53 | | |
| 54 | | F,,2,, = (4/9)*(u,,val,, + 2*u,,sea,,) + (1/9)*(d,,val,, + 2*d,,sea,,) + (1/9)*2*s,,sea,, |
| 55 | | |
| 56 | | F,,1,, = F,,2,,/2x |
| 57 | | |
| 58 | | with Q^2^ = Q^2^,,min,, for the region below the Q^2^,,min,, of each parametrization. |
| 59 | | |
| 60 | | The built-in PDFs in `LPAIR` are replaced by two paramatrizations for the parton densities: |
| 61 | | |
| 62 | | 1. Glueck-Reya-Vogt (`GRV`) [[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s100520050289|Eur. Phys. J. '''C5''' (1998) 461]]: version `GRV95` at leading order (`LO`) in α,,s,,. |
| 63 | | |
| 64 | | * 0.4 < Q^2^/GeV^2^ < 1.E6; |
| 65 | | * 1.E-5 < x < 1. |
| 66 | | |
| 67 | | [[source:trunk/plots/PDFs/GRV/README|README]] |
| 68 | | |
| 69 | | 2. Parametrization by Fiore et al [[http://epja.epj.org/articles/epja/abs/2002/10/100500505/100500505.html|Eur. Phys. J. '''A15''' (2002) 505]]. |
| 70 | | |
| 71 | | >**Abstract**: An explicit model realizing parton-hadron duality and fiting the data is suggested. Complex nonlinear Regge trajectories are important ingredients of the |
| 72 | | >model. The inclusion of ∆ and N^∗^ trajectories should account for all resonances in the direct channel. The exotic trajectory is responsible for the smooth background. |
| 73 | | |
| 74 | | This parametrization is meant to fit the data for the low Q^2^ region, reproducing the resonances of low-mass mesons. The figure below shows the distribution F,,2,, vs. `x` for Q^2^ = 0.5 GeV^2^: |
| 75 | | |
| 76 | | [[Image(source:/trunk/plots/FIORE_F2_x.png, 500px)]] |
| 77 | | |
| 78 | | 3. Parametrization by `Martin-Ryskin-Stirling-Thorne` (`MRST` 2001) at leading order [[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269302014831|Phys. Lett. '''B531''' (2002) 216]] |
| 79 | | |
| 80 | | * 1.25 < Q^2^/GeV^2^ < 1.E6; |
| 81 | | * 1.E-5 < x < 1. |
| 82 | | |
| 83 | | [[source:trunk/plots/PDFs/MRST2001/README|README]] |
| 84 | | |
| 85 | | 4. Parametrization by `Martin-Stirling-Thorne-Watt` (`MSTW` 2008) at leading order [[http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140%2Fepjc%2Fs10052-009-1072-5| Eur. Phys. J. '''C63''' (2009) 189]] |
| 86 | | |
| 87 | | * 1.25 < Q^2^/GeV^2^ < 1.E7; |
| 88 | | * 1.E-5 < x < 1. |
| 89 | | |
| 90 | | [[source:trunk/plots/PDFs/MSTW2008/README|README]] |
| 91 | | |
| 92 | | === Variables === |
| 93 | | |
| 94 | | The final-state kinematics is used to make the distributions in terms of the variables of the interacting particles, like the photon virtuality, Q^2^, by: |
| 95 | | |
| 96 | | > Q^2^ = [P,,p,,(E)-p,,rem,,(E)]^2^-[P,,p,,(x)-p,,rem,,(x)]^2^-[P,,p,,(y)-p,,rem,,(y)]^2^-[P,,p,,(z)-p,,rem,,(z)]^2^ |
| 97 | | |
| 98 | | and the momentum fraction of the proton carried by the photon, x, by |
| 99 | | |
| 100 | | > x = Q^2^/(M,,X,,^2^-M,,p,,^2^+Q^2^), |
| 101 | | |
| 102 | | with ξ given by |
| 103 | | |
| 104 | | > ξ=`log`,,10,,(x) |
| 105 | | |
| 106 | | === Comparison between W,,1,, and W,,2,, Structure Functions === |
| 107 | | |
| 108 | | [[https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/LpairAnalysis/wiki/W1W2StructFunc|Distributions]] |
| 109 | | |
| 110 | | |
| 111 | | == Results == |
| 112 | | |
| 113 | | === No experimental cuts === |
| 114 | | |
| 115 | | ==== Cross sections ==== |
| 116 | | |
| 117 | | The predicted cross sections using each PDF for the parton densities are: |
| 118 | | |
| 119 | | ||= **PDF** =||= **Cross section (pb)** =|| |
| 120 | | ||= **`SURI-YENNIE`** =|| 9262. || |
| 121 | | ||= **`FIORE`** =|| 10557. || |
| 122 | | ||= **`GRV`** =|| 7749. || |
| 123 | | |
| 124 | | and when producing the sub-samples by Q^2^ cuts: |
| 125 | | |
| 126 | | ||= **PDF** =||||||||||= **Cross section (pb)** =|| |
| 127 | | ||= Q^2^ (GeV^2^) =||= 0-1. =||= 1.-5. =||= 5.-20. =||= 20.-50. =||= 50.-100. =|| |
| 128 | | ||= **`SURI-YENNIE`** =|| 3379.41 || 387.51 || 73.95 || 13.10 || 3.86 || |
| 129 | | ||= **`FIORE`** =|| 4140.11 || 747.88 || 40.18 || 0.477 || 0.0124 || |
| 130 | | ||= **`GRV`** =|| 2439.74 || 484.31 || 105.41 || 19.22 || 5.51 || |
| 131 | | |
| 132 | | ==== Distributions ==== |
| 133 | | |
| 134 | | The kinematic distributions are presented below for the sets of 1M and 5M events considering the possibilities for the parton densities. |
| 135 | | |
| 136 | | OneMillionEvents |
| 137 | | |
| 138 | | FiveMillionEvents |
| 139 | | |
| 140 | | One should notice that the samples with 5M events show different distributions w.r.t. the fact that the five regions are produced with Q^2^ cuts, which comnpletely changes the p,,T,, distributions of the dileptons. |
| 141 | | |
| 142 | | |
| 143 | | === Experimental cuts === |
| 144 | | |
| 145 | | In order to have results closer to the observed results in the data analysis, event samples are produced within the experimental acceptance used for at trigger level in CMS: |
| 146 | | |
| 147 | | 1. p,,T,,(μ) > 15. GeV; |
| 148 | | |
| 149 | | 2. |η(μ)| < 2.5; |
| 150 | | |
| 151 | | 3. M(μ^+^μ^-^) > 20. GeV. |
| 152 | | |
| 153 | | ==== Cross sections ==== |
| 154 | | |
| 155 | | ||= **PDF** =||||= **Cross section (pb)** =|| |
| 156 | | ||= M,,X,max,, =||= 100 GeV =||= 300 GeV =|| |
| 157 | | ||= **`SURI-YENNIE`** =|| 0.82 || 0.87 || |
| 158 | | ||= **`GRV`** =|| 0.92 || 1.01 || |
| 159 | | |
| 160 | | ==== Distributions ==== |
| 161 | | |
| 162 | | The first set of plots shows the events restricted to a hadronic system with mass lower than **100 GeV**, while the second consider masses up to **300 GeV**. |
| 163 | | |
| 164 | | [[https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/LpairAnalysis/wiki/1MevtCutsMx100GeV|SURI-GRV: Distributions with 1M events for Mx > 100 GeV]] |
| 165 | | |
| 166 | | [[https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/LpairAnalysis/wiki/1MevtCutsMx300GeV|SURI-GRV: Distributions with 1M events for Mx > 300 GeV]] |
| 167 | | |
| 168 | | [[https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/LpairAnalysis/wiki/5MevtSURIGRVCutsMx300GeV|SURI-GRV: Distributions with 5M events for Mx > 300 GeV]] |
| 169 | | |
| 170 | | [[https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/LpairAnalysis/wiki/5MevtSURIGRVMRSTMSTWCutsMx300GeV|MRSTlo-MSTWlo-MSTWnlo: Distributions with 5M events for Mx > 300 GeV]] |
| 171 | | |
| 172 | | |
| 173 | | === Ratio === |
| 174 | | |
| 175 | | The comparisons are performed by the ratio between the distributions with experimental acceptance for the `SURI-YENNIE` and `GRV` parametrizations: |
| 176 | | |
| 177 | | [[https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/LpairAnalysis/wiki/RatioSURIGRVCutsMx300GeV|Ratio between SURI and GRV]] |
| 178 | | |
| 179 | | [[https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/LpairAnalysis/wiki/RatioSURIGRVMSTWMRSTCutsMx300GeV|Ratio between SURI, GRV, MSTW and MRST]] and normalized by the production cross section [[https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/LpairAnalysis/wiki/RatioXsecSURIGRVMSTWMRSTCutsMx300GeV|here]] |
| 180 | | |
| 181 | | == LPAIR++ == |
| 182 | | |
| 183 | | to be added |